Bookmark and Share

From: Food Quality & Safety magazine, June/July 2011

Japan's Earthquake and Tsunami Trigger Food-Supply Cautions

by By Catherine Shaffer

A ferry rests amid destroyed houses in Miyako in Iwate, the second-largest prefecture in Japan, after the 9.0 earthquake and subsequent tsunami that struck March 11. Inset: Tsunami victims line up for provisions at a 7-Eleven in Sendai in Miyagi Prefecture.
A ferry rests amid destroyed houses in Miyako in Iwate, the second-largest prefecture in Japan, after the 9.0 earthquake and subsequent tsunami that struck March 11. Inset: Tsunami victims line up for provisions at a 7-Eleven in Sendai in Miyagi Prefecture.

The magnitude 9.0 earthquake and subsequent tsunami that struck Japan on March 11, killing more than 26,000 people and damaging or destroying more than 125,000 buildings, has also threatened the nation’s food production system and tested emergency quality assurance procedures.

Damage at four reactors at the Fukushima 1 Nuclear Power Plant, located in the Futaba District of Fukushima Prefecture, led to the release of radioactivity and the discovery of radioactive isotopes in some foods, including spinach and milk. Although the crisis has caused international alarm, the scope of the problem is considered limited to Japan and well under control there.

Japan’s government responded to the disaster by issuing a set of limits for radiation content in food and a program of inspection. The radionuclides of particular concern are iodine-131, cesium-134, and cesium-137, but authorities are also monitoring for the presence of uranium and plutonium isotopes.

Radiation can enter the food chain when isotopes from the plume are deposited on plant or soil surfaces, or released into water. The surface contamination can lead to tissue contamination if the substances are consumed or inhaled. In some cases, radioactive material can concentrate in tissue. Contaminated produce or meats could result in illness even for those living far from the site of the disaster.

“In general, the risk to the food supply after a nuclear accident depends on a variety of factors, which can include the amount and type of radioactive emission; wind speed, its direction, and whether or not there is precipitation, which affects dispersion of material; and the type of food being produced, as some foods absorb radioactive materials differently,” said Aphaluck Bhatiasevi, Communications Officer, Global Alert and Response Department for the World Health Organization.

Japan has set limits of 300 becquerels (Bq) per kilogram radioactive iodine in drinking water and milk, and 2,000 for vegetables (excluding root vegetables). Milk used in baby formula must contain less than 100 Bq/kg. With regard to radioactive cesium, drinking water and milk must fall below 200 Bq/kg, and most other foods are limited to 500. Limits are much lower for uranium, alpha-emitting nuclides of plutonium, and transuranic elements.

A becquerel is the amount of radioactive material in which one decay occurs per second.

Early in the unfolding disaster, Japanese food safety inspectors found iodine-131 in milk at levels five times the allowable limit and in spinach at seven times the limit.

The ongoing discharge of radioactive water into the ocean has also caused concerns about contamination of seafood. The ocean dilutes the radioactivity, mitigating the problem, and the most common contaminant, iodine-131, with a half-life of eight days, will rapidly disappear from the environment.

According to Bhatiasevi, tests have found radioactive cesium and iodine in some fish samples. “In the longer term,” she said, “bioaccumulation can occur in seafood. It is therefore important to continue to monitor seafood for a long period of time. WHO and its partners are researching the potential contamination of seafood and implications for other countries and areas, if any.”

Nearby nations, including South Korea, Hong Kong, China, and Australia, have been testing imported foods from Japan or have banned them.

Japan imports more food than it exports, but some foods are shipped to other countries. Australia has restricted imports of milk and milk products, fresh fruit, vegetables, seaweed, and seafood from Japanese prefectures affected by the nuclear disaster.

Hong Kong banned a variety of Japanese food imports after discovering radioactive material on three samples of vegetables up to 10 times more than the level that is considered safe. Hong Kong’s ban applies to dairy, fruit, vegetables, and meat from five prefectures near Fukushima 1. Poultry and seafood must be given safety clearance by Japanese authorities before it can be imported into Hong Kong.

Hong Kong authorities have also detected radioactive material in produce imported from China’s Guangdong province but said the levels were well within the safe range and could be mitigated further by repeated washing.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) imposed similar restrictions on the import of Japanese foods, particularly those from Fukushima, Gunma, Ibaraki, Tochigi, Chiba, and Saitama prefectures. As of April 19, the FDA had conducted 3,522 field examinations for radionuclide contamination and had tested 89 samples. The agency found no iodine-131, cesium-134, cesium-137, or other gamma-ray emitting radionuclides.

Because of concerns about radionuclides appearing in food produced within Japan, economist Matthew Circosta of Moody’s Analytics Australia Pty Ltd. predicts that countries exporting food to Japan will benefit.

“Food products accounted for only ¥344 billion of foreign sales in 2010, just 0.5% of total exports,” Circosta said. “Food and meat products account for about 8% of Japan’s total imports, and over 45% of these supplies are shipped from the Asia-Pacific region. Chinese, Australian, and New Zealand exporters are set to receive the largest boost.”

Circosta reported that disaster-stricken prefectures Iwate, Miyagi, Fukushima, and Ibaraki produce meat, seafood, vegetables, and rice. There will most likely be an increase of seafood imports. “Media reports from China and Vietnam suggest seafood exporters have been inundated with orders from Japanese customers in recent days,” Circosta wrote. “Large meat suppliers Australia and New Zealand should receive a strong boost since Japan is the world’s largest importer for pork and the second-largest importer of beef.”

The impact of the Fukushima nuclear disaster on the world food supply is likely to be negligible, experts said, both because Japan’s exports are negligible and because the plume of radioactive materials is not large enough to cause significant contamination of other food-producing regions. The disaster will, however, have potentially long-lasting effects on Japan’s domestic food supply, with many consumers choosing to avoid even those Japanese products that are deemed safe for the market by the government.



Current Issue

Current Issue

February/March 2015

Site Search

Site Navigation